Lewisham West and Penge Liberal Democrats

Parliamentary Candidate Alex Feakes

Alex Feakes, Parliamentary Candidate for Lewisham West & Penge

Lib Dems: Mayor Makes Mockery Of Choice On Forest Hill Pools

9.43.48am GMT Mon 2nd Mar 2009

Cllrs Alex Feakes, John Russell and Philip Peake

Cllrs Alex Feakes, John Russell and Philip Peake want swimming retained in Forest Hill

Forest Hill's Liberal Democrat councillors have condemned Lewisham's Labour Mayor for offering residents a false choice between unfunded and unwanted options for the future of Forest Hill Pools. Two options will go to consultation, down from the three open to the Mayor: either a new pool on its current site open in 2015 but with funding not guaranteed, or having a new pool built in Sydenham by 2012 and housing on the current site, but with planning risk and more funding.

"All of the options put to residents must be achievable and deliverable if we are to be given a real choice," commented Cllr Alex Feakes.

"Presenting undeliverable, unfunded and unwanted options makes a mockery of giving local residents a genuine say."

"After thirty years of underinvestment and delays, local residents are tired of the neglect inflicted on their local pool by an indifferent council. They

want swimming to return to the current site as soon as possible, and simply will not understand excuses related to policy and bureaucracy that are within the Mayor's control," said Alex.

Since the Pools closed in 2006, council officers have produced an exhausting series of reports and studies about its future. Predicted costs, funding, designs and options have varied widely, leading to increasing scepticism from the public about the Mayor's commitment to keeping swimming in Forest Hill.

Cllr Philip Peake commented: "In the past few years, the Mayor has told people that fitting two pools on to the site is impossible and that it would be far cheaper to demolish the facade than reuse it. Now, he's done a complete U-turn on these issues, but says his 'back of the envelope' calculations show he can't keep his promise to retain swimming in Forest Hill."

"It would not be surprising if the public have little confidence in the consultation, especially as it seems the Mayor seems set on building the pools away from the town centre," said Philip.

"As Forest Hill's councillors, we've been trying our best to keep swimming in Forest Hill, and we have been putting forward concrete ideas and suggestions to help make this happen," said Cllr John Russell. "The rushed consultation the Mayor is proposing will be a sham and ironically will lead to greater delay, because the Mayor has failed to provide the necessary resources for a proper choice between the two options. The Mayor needs to undertake more work prior to the consultation to ensure residents are given a real choice. "

"We will continue working constructively with local residents and council officers to try and find ways of making retention of swimming in Forest Hill more affordable. Further practical compromises are possible given the necessary political will. This is the only way that residents will be given a genuine choice."

Bookmark this story at: del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg FacebookFacebook LibDigLibDig redditreddit StumbleUponStumbleUpon
Print this news story.
Comment on this news story.
Previous news story: Bromley Lib Dems propose Council Tax Freeze; Tories force through tax rise despite economic hardship (Tue 24th Feb 2009).
Next news story: Lewisham Labour's Council Tax Rise Scrapes Through With Tory Help (Tue 3rd Mar 2009).

Related News Stories:

Sun 29th Nov 2009:

Fri 14th Aug 2009:

Mon 25th May 2009:

Tue 7th Apr 2009:

Fri 6th Feb 2009:

Fri 17th Oct 2008:

Mon 13th Oct 2008:

Fri 11th Apr 2008:

Mon 11th Feb 2008:

Mon 24th Sep 2007:

Thu 14th Jun 2007:

Mon 4th Jun 2007:

Tue 15th May 2007:

Printed and hosted by Prater Raines Ltd, 98 Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BY.
Published and promoted by James Chard on behalf of Alex Feakes and Lewisham West & Penge Liberal Democrats, all at 8 Woodham Road, London SE6 2SD
The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider.